Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.5 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-05-17 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.81 x 3.48 x 0.30 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.16 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black |
| Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 344 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8956 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.18 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4850mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.64 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has a general score of 81, which is a little bit better than the Xiaomi Mi Max's general score of 77.5. Even though the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro is much newer than Xiaomi Mi Max, it's just a little heavier and incredibly thicker. Galaxy XCover Pro counts with just a bit better performance than Xiaomi Mi Max. Both of them have 4 GB of RAM memory and a Octa-Core processor.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro features a slightly better display than Xiaomi Mi Max, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a just a bit more pixels per inch in the display. Xiaomi Mi Max features more memory for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 256 GB against 512 GB, it also counts with 64 GB more internal storage capacity.
The Xiaomi Mi Max features improved battery life than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has 4850mAh of battery capacity against 4050mAh. Galaxy XCover Pro has a slightly better camera than Xiaomi Mi Max, and although they both have the same video definition and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy XCover Pro also has a way more MP back facing camera and a bigger aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.