Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Apple |
| 2017-10-10 | 2017-11-03 |
| 5.98 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Black | Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 614.00 | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.45 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.36 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The iPhone X is just a bit better than Xiaomi Mi MIX 2, with a general score of 88.1 against 81.2. The iPhone X design has the same thickness than the Xiaomi Mi MIX 2, but it's a little lighter. The Apple iPhone X has a bit more powerful processing unit than Xiaomi Mi MIX 2, because although it has 2 lesser and slower cores and a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a 64 bits processor.
IPhone X has just a bit better looking screen than Xiaomi Mi MIX 2, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit more pixels per inch of screen and a little bit higher 1125 x 2436 resolution. The iPhone X shoots a bit better videos and photos than Xiaomi Mi MIX 2, because although it has a smaller camera sensor taking lower quality videos and photos, and they both have a back camera with a 12 megapixels resolution and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the iPhone X also counts with better 60 fps video frame rates and a larger camera aperture for better low-light captures and video.
The Xiaomi Mi MIX 2 and the Apple iPhone X both count with extremely similar storage capacity to install games and applications, they have equal 256 GB internal memory. The Xiaomi Mi MIX 2 counts with better battery life than Apple iPhone X, because it has a 25% greater battery capacity.
Although Apple iPhone X is a better device, it is way more expensive than Xiaomi Mi MIX 2, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Xiaomi Mi MIX 2. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can buy the Xiaomi Mi MIX 2, and give up a few specs and features, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.