Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-10-10 | 2020-08-20 |
| 5.98 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black | Just black |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 614.00 | $ 349.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.36 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a is slightly better than the Xiaomi Mi MIX 2, having an 82.9 score against 81.2. The Google Pixel 4a construction is a lot newer and noticeably lighter, but just a bit thicker than the Xiaomi Mi MIX 2. Google Pixel 4a features just a bit better looking screen than Xiaomi Mi MIX 2, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a quite greater quantity of pixels per screen inch and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2340px.
The Xiaomi Mi MIX 2 has a much bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Google Pixel 4a, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity. Xiaomi Mi MIX 2 has a little bit better hardware performance than Google Pixel 4a. Both of them have a 6 GB RAM memory and 8 cores. The Google Pixel 4a shoots just a bit better pictures and videos than Xiaomi Mi MIX 2, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Google Pixel 4a also has a back camera with a higher resolution, a larger diafragm aperture and a bigger back camera sensor taking better quality pictures and videos.
The Xiaomi Mi MIX 2 counts with a bit superior battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4a, because it has an 8 percent greater battery capacity.
Google Pixel 4a is not only the best phones in this comparison, but it's also very cheap compared to the other ones, which makes this phone a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.