Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2017-10-10 | 2019-09-27 |
| 5.98 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Black | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 614.00 | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.36 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Fold has a general score of 97.6, which is way better than Xiaomi Mi MIX 2's general score of 81.2. The Samsung Galaxy Fold construction is newer and a bit thinner, but also incredibly heavier than Xiaomi Mi MIX 2. The Xiaomi Mi MIX 2 has a bit better looking display than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a bit smaller screen and a quite lower 1080 x 2160 resolution, it also counts with a just a bit better amount of pixels in each inch of screen.
The Galaxy Fold features a superior memory capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Mi MIX 2, because it has more internal memory. Galaxy Fold counts with a bit faster processor than Xiaomi Mi MIX 2, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy Fold also has 6 GB more RAM memory. The Galaxy Fold takes a bit better photographs and videos than Xiaomi Mi MIX 2, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and a same resolution camera, the Galaxy Fold also has a larger sensor which provides a better image and video quality, higher 60 fps video frame rate and a much bigger aperture to capture better photos and video in low light environments.
The Galaxy Fold features greater battery duration than Xiaomi Mi MIX 2, because it has 4380mAh of battery capacity.
Although Galaxy Fold is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Xiaomi Mi MIX 2, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Xiaomi Mi MIX 2. If you want to save a few dollars, you can get the Xiaomi Mi MIX 2, and give up a few features and specifications, but you will get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.