Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 85.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Apple |
| -- | iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x |
| 2018-04-03 | 2019-09-20 |
| 5.94 x 2.95 x 0.32 inches | 6.22 x 3.06 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 7.97 ounces |
| Black and White | Gold, Midnight green, Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 639.00 | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2688 x 1242 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 456 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Apple-designed 4 core GPU |
| 9.63 | 10.35 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3969mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.36 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone 11 Pro Max is just a bit better than the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, getting a overall score of 85.3 against 83.8. IPhone 11 Pro Max's design has the same thickness than the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, but it is somewhat heavier. The Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max counts with just a bit better processing power than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because although it has an inferior number of cores and slower and less RAM, it also counts with a 64 bits processor.
IPhone 11 Pro Max has a much better display than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because it has a better 1242 x 2688 resolution, a quite greater pixel number in each inch in the display and a bit larger display. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s features a very superior memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity.
The Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max captures a bit better photographs and videos than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, and although they both have the same back camera sensor size, a F1.8 camera aperture, the same resolution back camera and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max also has faster video frame rate.
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max counts with superior battery lifetime than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because it has a 3969mAh battery size instead of 3400mAh.
Although iPhone 11 Pro Max is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s. If you prefer to save some money, you can buy Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, giving up a couple features and specs, but you'll get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.