Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Apple |
| -- | iOS 9.x |
| 2018-04-03 | 2015-09-09 |
| 5.94 x 2.95 x 0.32 inches | 6.23 x 3.07 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black and White | Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | Aluminium, Glass and Steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 639.00 | $ 625.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 402 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Apple A9 APL1022 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | 64-bit Twister, 64-bit (Dual-Core 1840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 2 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | PowerVR GT7600 (650 MHz) GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 29.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.9 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2750mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| -- | 384 hours standby time 24 hours talk time |
| 5.36 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 6s Plus is just a bit better than the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, having a global score of 84.2 against 83.8. Even though the Apple iPhone 6s Plus is notably older and a little bit heavier than the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, it's body is still a little thinner. The iPhone 6s Plus has a much better looking screen than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, although it has a quite worse count of pixels per display inch, a little smaller screen and a little worse resolution of 1920 x 1080.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s features a very superior storage for applications, games, photos and videos than iPhone 6s Plus, because it has more internal storage. IPhone 6s Plus features a bit better processing unit than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because although it has less RAM and 6 less and slower cpu cores, it also counts with a 64-bits CPU and an extra graphics processing unit.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s takes clearer pictures and videos than iPhone 6s Plus, and although they both have the same resolution camera in the back, the same video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s also has a larger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a larger aperture for better captures in poorly lited environments.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s has better battery duration than iPhone 6s Plus, because it has 3400mAh of battery capacity against 2750mAh.
In addition to being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, the iPhone 6s Plus is also cheaper than the other phone, which makes it an easy choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.