Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Apple |
| 2018-04-03 | 2017-11-03 |
| 5.94 x 2.95 x 0.32 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Black and White | Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 639.00 | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.63 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.36 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone X is just a bit better than the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, getting a general score of 88.1 against 83.8. Apple iPhone X is a a little bit lighter and just a little bit thinner cellphone than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, although both were only released 5 months apart. Apple iPhone X has a bit more powerful processor than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because although it has an inferior number of cores and 5 GB less RAM, it also counts with a 64-bit processing unit.
IPhone X counts with a bit better looking screen than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a quite better quantity of pixels per inch in the display and a slightly better resolution of 1125 x 2436px. IPhone X's storage capacity for games and applications is just as good as Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s's one, both of them have exactly the same internal memory capacity.
The Apple iPhone X counts with a little bit better camera than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because although it has a smaller back-facing camera sensor, and they both have a same resolution camera in the back, the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same diafragm aperture, the Apple iPhone X also counts with higher 60 fps video frame rate.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s features greater battery life than iPhone X, because it has a 25 percent bigger battery size.
Although iPhone X is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can get Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, and give up a few features and specifications, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.