Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Apple |
| 2018-04-03 | 2018-10-26 |
| 5.94 x 2.95 x 0.32 inches | 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 639.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 1792 x 828 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 402 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.63 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.36 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s is a bit better than the Apple iPhone XR, with an 83.8 score against 82. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s design is just a little lighter and a little thinner than the Apple iPhone XR, although they were only released 7 months apart. IPhone XR features a bit superior CPU than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because although it has 5 GB less RAM and a lower number of cores, it also counts with a 64-bit CPU.
The Apple iPhone XR features just a bit better looking screen than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because although it has a way worse resolution of 828 x 1792 pixels and a little bit worse screen density, it also counts with a quite larger display. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s has much more storage to install games and applications than iPhone XR, because it has 256 GB internal memory.
IPhone XR shoots clearer photographs and videos than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, and although they both have a same size aperture, a 12 MP camera, the same video definition and the same sensor size, the iPhone XR also has faster video frame rate. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s counts with just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Apple iPhone XR, because it has a 3400mAh battery capacity against 2942mAh.
Even being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s is also cheap compared to the iPhone XR, which makes buying this phone a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.