Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Apple |
| 2018-04-03 | 2018-09-21 |
| 5.94 x 2.95 x 0.32 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| Black and White | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 639.00 | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.63 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.36 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone XS has a global score of 84.2, which is just a bit better than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s's overall score of 83.8. Even when iPhone XS and Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s were only released 6 months apart, iPhone XS is just a little bit thinner and a little lighter. The iPhone XS counts with a little sharper screen than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a bit higher 1125 x 2436 resolution and a bit higher pixel amount in each inch in the display.
The iPhone XS has a bit faster processor than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because although it has a lower number of cores and 4 GB lesser RAM, it also counts with a 64-bits processing unit. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s features a much bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than iPhone XS, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity.
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s counts with better battery lifetime than iPhone XS, because it has a 3400mAh battery size instead of 2659mAh. IPhone XS counts with just a bit better camera than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, and although they both have the same back-facing camera sensor size, a same resolution back camera, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same aperture, the iPhone XS also has higher video frame rate.
Although Apple iPhone XS is a better device, it is way more expensive than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s. If you are trying to save some money, you can buy Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, and give up some specs and features, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.