Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| 2018-04-03 | 2016-10-20 |
| 5.94 x 2.95 x 0.32 inches | 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Gray and White |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 639.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.36 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s has a score of 83.8, which is a little bit better than the Google Pixel's general score of 80.2. Even though the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s is noticeably heavier than Google Pixel, it's just a little bit thinner and newer. Google Pixel counts with a bit more vivid screen than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because although it has a quite smaller display and a bit worse 1080 x 1920 resolution, it also counts with a just a bit greater pixels density.
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s features a much better storage capacity to store more apps and games than Google Pixel, because it has 256 GB internal memory. Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s counts with just a little better performance than Google Pixel, because it has a higher number of cores (and faster) and 4 GB more RAM memory.
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s and Google Pixel have extremely similar cameras, because although the Google Pixel has a tinier camera aperture which is not so good for low light photos, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same (4K) video quality, it also counts with a camera in the back with more MP and a bigger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s features improved battery performance than Google Pixel, because it has a 23% bigger battery capacity.
Although Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Google Pixel, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Google Pixel. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, but if you don't you can save some money and get the Google Pixel, letting go a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.