Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| 2018-04-03 | 2017-10-19 |
| 5.94 x 2.95 x 0.32 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.17 ounces |
| Black and White | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 639.00 | $ 152.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3520mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.36 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s is just a bit better than the Google Pixel 2 XL, getting an 83.8 score against 82.5. Despite being the best in this review, the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s is a just a little bit thicker and just a little bit heavier cellphone than the Google Pixel 2 XL. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s has a bit more powerful processing unit than Google Pixel 2 XL, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
Google Pixel 2 XL counts with a bit more vivid screen than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, and although they both have a screen with the same size, the Google Pixel 2 XL also has a better pixel density and a better 1440 x 2880 resolution. The Google Pixel 2 XL has a camera that is very similar to the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s one, because although the Google Pixel 2 XL has a tinier sensor taking worse quality images, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates, a same size diafragm aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, it also counts with a camera in the back with a higher 12.2 mega-pixels resolution.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s features much more storage to install games and applications than Google Pixel 2 XL, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity. Google Pixel 2 XL has just a bit longer battery life than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because it has a 3520mAh battery capacity instead of 3400mAh.
Although Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s is a better device, it is way more expensive than Google Pixel 2 XL, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Google Pixel 2 XL. If you are trying to save some money, you can get the Google Pixel 2 XL, letting go a couple features, but you'll get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.