Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| 2018-04-03 | 2018-10-18 |
| 5.94 x 2.95 x 0.32 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 639.00 | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.36 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s has an overall score of 83.8, which is just a bit better than Google Pixel 3's global score of 80. Despite being the best in our current comparison, the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s body is a little thicker and noticeably heavier than Google Pixel 3. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have 8 cores, the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s also has more RAM memory.
Google Pixel 3 features a little more vivid screen than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because although it has a quite smaller display, and they both have the same exact 1080 x 2160 resolution, the Google Pixel 3 also counts with a little greater amount of pixels in each inch of screen. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s features a lot bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Google Pixel 3, because it has 256 GB internal storage.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s and the Google Pixel 3 have quite similar cameras, and although the Google Pixel 3 has a more mega-pixels camera in the back, they both have the same camera aperture, the same 3840x2160 video definition, the same video frame rates and the same back-facing camera sensor size. Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s features a bit longer battery performance than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 17 percent bigger battery size.
Although Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Google Pixel 3, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Google Pixel 3. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, else you can save a couple dollars and get the Google Pixel 3, letting go a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.