Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| 2018-04-03 | 2018-10-18 |
| 5.94 x 2.95 x 0.32 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 639.00 | $ 194.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 522 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.36 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s has a score of 83.8, which is slightly better than the Google Pixel 3 XL's 80.7 score. Although Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s is a better cellphone than Google Pixel 3 XL, it must be told that it's also a little bit heavier and just a little thicker. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s features a bit better hardware performance than Google Pixel 3 XL, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s also has a greater amount of RAM.
The Google Pixel 3 XL counts with a bit better looking screen than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because it has a greater pixel density, a better resolution of 1440 x 2960 and a little bit larger screen. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s has a lot bigger memory for apps and games than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity.
Google Pixel 3 XL counts with a camera that's very similar to the camera in Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, and although the Google Pixel 3 XL has a better 12.2 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera, they both have the same video frame rates, a 0.39 inches back camera sensor, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a F1.8 aperture.
Google Pixel 3 XL features just a little bit longer battery performance than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because it has 3430mAh of battery capacity.
Although Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Google Pixel 3 XL, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Google Pixel 3 XL. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, else you can save a couple dollars and buy the Google Pixel 3 XL, giving up some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.