Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| -- | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-04-03 | 2019-05-07 |
| 5.94 x 2.95 x 0.32 inches | 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 5.19 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Purple and White |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 639.00 | $ 186.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.36 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s has an overall score of 83.8, which is slightly better than Google Pixel 3a's 78.8 general score. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s is a heavier cellphone than Google Pixel 3a, but they are 0.32inches thick. The Google Pixel 3a has a bit more vivid screen than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a just a little more pixels per inch of display and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2220 pixels.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s counts with a much better memory for applications and games than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity. Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s has a bit better hardware performance than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s also has 4 GB more RAM memory.
Google Pixel 3a and Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s feature very similar cameras, and although the Google Pixel 3a has a back camera with a better 12.2 mega-pixels resolution, they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the same back camera sensor size, the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same diafragm aperture.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s counts with just a bit better battery life than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a 3400mAh battery capacity.
Although Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Google Pixel 3a, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Google Pixel 3a. So if you want that extra features, you can buy Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, else you can save some money and get the Google Pixel 3a, resigning some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.