Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| -- | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-04-03 | 2019-05-07 |
| 5.94 x 2.95 x 0.32 inches | 6.30 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Purple and White |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 639.00 | $ 167.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.36 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s has a general score of 83.8, which is a bit better than Google Pixel 3a XL's global score of 78.9. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s is a heavier phone than Google Pixel 3a XL, but both of them are equally thin. Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s counts with just a little better hardware performance than Google Pixel 3a XL, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s also has 4 GB more RAM memory.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s has a slightly better display than Google Pixel 3a XL. Both of them have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2160, a same size screen and a higher amount of pixels per inch of display. Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s features a much bigger storage to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has 192 GB more internal memory capacity.
The Google Pixel 3a XL has a little better battery performance than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because it has a 9 percent bigger battery capacity. The Google Pixel 3a XL counts with a camera that is just as good as the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s one, and although the Google Pixel 3a XL has a camera with a better resolution, they both have the same video quality, the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, a F1.8 diafragm aperture and a 0.39 inches camera sensor.
Although Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s is a better device, it is way more expensive than Google Pixel 3a XL, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Google Pixel 3a XL. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can buy Google Pixel 3a XL, letting go a couple features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.