Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| 2018-04-03 | 2019-10-24 |
| 5.94 x 2.95 x 0.32 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Black and White | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 639.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.36 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s has a score of 83.8, which is a little bit better than Google Pixel 4's 81.9 general score. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s design has the same thickness than Google Pixel 4, but it's somewhat heavier. Google Pixel 4 features a little sharper screen than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a little bit higher 1080 x 2280 resolution and a little bit better number of pixels per screen inch.
Google Pixel 4's CPU is just as good as the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s one, and although the Google Pixel 4 has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores. Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s and Google Pixel 4 have really similar cameras, and although the Google Pixel 4 has a bigger diafragm aperture to take better low-light photography and a more mega pixels camera in the back, they both have a same size sensor, the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same 30 fps video frame rate.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s has a superior storage capacity for apps and games than Google Pixel 4, because it has 256 GB internal storage. Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s has longer battery life than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 3400mAh battery size against 2800mAh.
Although Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Google Pixel 4, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Google Pixel 4. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and get the Google Pixel 4, resigning a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.