Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| 2018-04-03 | 2019-10-24 |
| 5.94 x 2.95 x 0.32 inches | 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Black and White | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 639.00 | $ 487.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.36 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s has a general score of 83.8, which is a little bit better than the Google Pixel 4 XL's score of 82.9. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s construction has the same thickness than the Google Pixel 4 XL, but it's just a bit lighter. The Google Pixel 4 XL has a bit sharper display than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because it has a higher pixels density, a quite larger screen and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3040px.
The Google Pixel 4 XL features a processing unit that's just as good as Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s's processing unit, and although the Google Pixel 4 XL has less RAM, they both have 8 CPU cores. Google Pixel 4 XL and Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s both have similar cameras, and although the Google Pixel 4 XL has a camera in the back with more megapixels and a bigger aperture to capture better photos and videos in poorly lited environments, they both have the same sensor size, the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same video definition.
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s has a much bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has 256 GB internal storage. Google Pixel 4 XL counts with a bit longer battery life than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because it has a 3700mAh battery size.
Although Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s is a better device, it costs more than the Google Pixel 4 XL, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Google Pixel 4 XL. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can buy Google Pixel 4 XL, giving up some specs and features, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.