Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-04-03 | 2020-08-20 |
| 5.94 x 2.95 x 0.32 inches | 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black and White | Just black |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 639.00 | $ 349.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.36 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s is just a bit better than Google Pixel 4a, with a overall score of 83.8 against 82.9. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s is a a lot heavier phone than Google Pixel 4a, but they are 0.32inches thick. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s features a little faster processor than Google Pixel 4a, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s also has 2 GB more RAM.
The Google Pixel 4a features just a bit better looking screen than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a little bit higher 1080 x 2340px resolution and a quite better display density. Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s counts with a much greater storage for applications and games than Google Pixel 4a, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity.
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s and Google Pixel 4a count with really similar cameras, and although the Google Pixel 4a has a larger aperture for better low-light images and video and a more MP back camera, they both have a 0.39 inches sensor, the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution.
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s counts with just a bit longer battery duration than Google Pixel 4a, because it has 3400mAh of battery capacity.
Although Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Google Pixel 4a, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Google Pixel 4a. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, otherwise you can save some dollars and get the Google Pixel 4a, letting go some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.