Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2018-04-03 | 2020-11-19 |
| 5.94 x 2.95 x 0.32 inches | 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black and White | Clearly white and Just black |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 639.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3885mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.36 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a 5G has a score of 87.5, which is slightly better than the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s's 83.8 general score. Google Pixel 4a 5G's body has the same thickness than the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, but it is lighter. Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s counts with a bit better processing power than Google Pixel 4a 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s also has a greater amount of RAM.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G has a slightly better screen than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because it has a quite bigger display, a little bit higher display density and a slightly better 1080 x 2340px resolution. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s features a much greater memory to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has 256 GB internal storage.
Google Pixel 4a 5G features just a bit better camera than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, and although they both have the same back camera sensor size and the same video quality, the Google Pixel 4a 5G also has a better resolution camera in the back, a bigger aperture to take better images in low light environments and higher video frame rates.
Google Pixel 4a 5G features a bit superior battery duration than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because it has 3885mAh of battery capacity.
Even being the best phone of the ones we compare here, Google Pixel 4a 5G is also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.