Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| 2018-04-03 | 2020-10-15 |
| 5.94 x 2.95 x 0.32 inches | 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 5.33 ounces |
| Black and White | Just black and Sorta sage |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 639.00 | $ 548.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4080mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.36 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 5 is a bit better than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, having an 89 score against 83.8. Google Pixel 5 is a much newer device, and it is also notably lighter and a little bit thinner than the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s. The Google Pixel 5 counts with a bit more vivid screen than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, and although they both have a same size display, the Google Pixel 5 also has a little better screen density and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s counts with a much greater memory capacity to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 5, because it has more internal storage capacity. Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s counts with a bit better processor than Google Pixel 5. Both of them have 8 CPU cores and 8 GB of RAM memory. Google Pixel 5 features better battery performance than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because it has 4080mAh of battery capacity.
Google Pixel 5 captures a bit better videos and photos than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same camera sensor size, the Google Pixel 5 also has a bigger aperture to capture better photos in low light environments, faster video frame rates and a back camera with a higher 12.2 megapixels resolution.
Google Pixel 5 is not only the best phones between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also cheap compared to the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, which makes this phone an easy choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.