Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | HTC |
| 2018-04-03 | 2017-02-21 |
| 5.94 x 2.95 x 0.32 inches | 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Black and White | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 639.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | S-LCD 5 |
| 402 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.36 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s is a bit better than the HTC U Ultra, getting an 83.8 score against 77. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s is a newer phone than HTC U Ultra, but it's somewhat heavier and just a little thicker. HTC U Ultra has just a bit better looking display than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher display pixels density and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px.
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s counts with a bit faster processor than HTC U Ultra, because it has a higher number of cores and 4 GB more RAM. The HTC U Ultra shoots a little bit better pictures and videos than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, and although they both have the same video frame rate, a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the same video resolution and a 12 mega-pixels camera, the HTC U Ultra also has a bigger back-facing camera sensor taking better quality photographs.
The HTC U Ultra counts with a bigger memory for games and applications than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s counts with just a bit longer battery duration than HTC U Ultra, because it has a 3400mAh battery capacity.
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s is not only the best phones of the ones in this comparison, but it's also cheaper than the other phone, making it a very good choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.