Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | LG |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2018-04-03 | 2018-10-18 |
| 5.94 x 2.95 x 0.32 inches | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Black and White | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 639.00 | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.36 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s has an overall score of 83.8, which is a bit better than the LG V40 ThinQ's overall score of 81.2. Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s is a better phone than the LG V40 ThinQ, we must highlight that it is also heavier and a little thicker. The LG V40 ThinQ counts with a slightly better display than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because it has a little bit bigger display, a higher pixel count per inch in the display and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3120px.
The LG V40 ThinQ has a quite bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG V40 ThinQ features a CPU that's just as good as the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s one, and although the LG V40 ThinQ has lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
The LG V40 ThinQ features a bit better camera than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because although it has a smaller back camera sensor which offers a worse photo and video quality, and they both have a same resolution back camera and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the LG V40 ThinQ also counts with faster 60 frames per second video frame rate and a larger camera aperture to take better photography and video in low light environments.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s features just a little bit longer battery performance than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has 3400mAh of battery capacity.
Although Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s is a better device, it is way more expensive than the LG V40 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as LG V40 ThinQ. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can buy LG V40 ThinQ, giving up some specs and features, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.