Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | LG |
| 2018-04-03 | 2020-05-15 |
| 5.94 x 2.95 x 0.32 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black and White | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 639.00 | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.36 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Velvet has a general score of 87.1, which is a bit better than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s's 83.8 overall score. The LG Velvet body is incredibly newer, just a little thinner and just a bit lighter than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s. LG Velvet features a screen that is very similar to the display in Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because although the LG Velvet has a just a bit inferior pixel quantity in each inch in the screen, it also counts with a bit bigger display and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2460 pixels.
The LG Velvet has a very superior storage to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s counts with a little bit better processing power than LG Velvet, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s also has more RAM.
LG Velvet captures much better pictures and videos than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, and although they both have the same video frame rates, a same size camera aperture and the same (4K) video quality, the LG Velvet also has a much more mega pixels camera in the back and a way bigger back-facing camera sensor.
The LG Velvet counts with better battery life than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because it has a 4300mAh battery capacity instead of 3400mAh.
Despite of being the best phone in this comparison, the LG Velvet is also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.