Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2018-04-03 | 2024-04-16 |
| 5.94 x 2.95 x 0.32 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Black and White | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 639.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.36 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a general score of 87.1, which is slightly better than the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s's overall score of 83.8. Even though the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is noticeably newer than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, it is just a bit thicker and just a little heavier. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a brighter screen than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because although it has a just a little lower count of pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a little bigger display.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a very superior memory for games and applications than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because it has more internal memory. Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s has a very superior processing power than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features improved battery duration than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because it has a 32 percent larger battery size. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra captures much better photographs and videos than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, and although they both have the same video definition, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a bigger aperture to capture better low-light captures and videos, a back camera with a way better resolution, a way larger back camera sensor providing a way better image quality and faster video frame rate.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.