Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-04-03 | 2020-04-16 |
| 5.94 x 2.95 x 0.32 inches | 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black and White | Smoke black |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 639.00 | $ 150.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 402 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.36 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s is better than the Moto G Power, getting an 83.8 score against 76.1. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s construction is a bit lighter and thinner than the Moto G Power, although it was released 2 years before. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s counts with a bit faster processing unit than Motorola Moto G Power, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s also has 4 GB more RAM.
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s counts with a bit more vivid screen than Moto G Power, because although it has a quite lower 1080 x 2160 pixels resolution and a quite smaller display, it also counts with a bit better pixels amount per inch in the display. Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s features a better memory capacity to store more games and applications than Moto G Power, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage capacity.
The Motorola Moto G Power features a superior battery performance than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because it has a 47 percent more battery size. The Moto G Power counts with just a bit better camera than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because although it has a tinier camera sensor which offers a lower image and video quality, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Moto G Power also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture to take better low light images and video and a back camera with much more mega pixels.
Although Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Motorola Moto G Power, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Motorola Moto G Power. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can get Motorola Moto G Power, and give up a few specs and features, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.