Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| -- | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2018-04-03 | 2016-09-01 |
| 5.94 x 2.95 x 0.32 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 639.00 | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.36 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s has a score of 83.8, which is much better than the Moto Z Force's 75.8 general score. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s body is newer than Moto Z Force's, but it is thicker and heavier. The Motorola Moto Z Force features a slightly better looking display than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per inch of display and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels.
Moto Z Force features a bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s features a bit better processing unit than Moto Z Force, because it has a higher number of cores and a higher amount of RAM.
Moto Z Force counts with a little better battery life than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because it has a 3 percent larger battery size. The Moto Z Force shoots a bit better pictures and videos than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, and although they both have the same video frame rates, the same (4K) video definition and a same size aperture, the Moto Z Force also has a camera in the back with a lot higher resolution.
Although Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Moto Z Force, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Moto Z Force. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can get the Moto Z Force, giving up a couple features and specs, but you will get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.