Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2018-04-03 | 2018-08-16 |
| 5.94 x 2.95 x 0.32 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Black and White | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 639.00 | $ 297.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.36 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s has a general score of 83.8, which is just a bit better than the Motorola Moto Z3's 77.6 general score. Despite being the best cellphone in this comparison review, Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s is a somewhat thicker and heavier cellphone than the Motorola Moto Z3. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s and the Moto Z3 both have really similar displays, both of them have the same 1080 x 2160 resolution, a screen of the same size and a greater pixel count per inch of display.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s features a little better hardware performance than Motorola Moto Z3, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s also has 4 GB more RAM. Motorola Moto Z3 features a greater storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s features a bit longer battery duration than Moto Z3, because it has a 13 percent greater battery capacity. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s shoots just a bit better photographs and videos than Moto Z3, and although they both have the same video resolution, the same 30 fps video frame rates and a back facing camera with a 12 megapixels resolution, the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s also has a bigger sensor taking better quality photographs and videos and a bigger aperture.
Although Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s is a better device, it is way more expensive than Moto Z3, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Moto Z3. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, but if you don't you can save some dollars and buy the Moto Z3, giving up a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.