Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-04-03 | 2019-10-16 |
| 5.94 x 2.95 x 0.32 inches | 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Black and White | Cyber shade |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 639.00 | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.36 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s is much better than nubia Red Magic 3S, getting a general score of 83.8 against 75.8. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s construction is somewhat lighter and somewhat thinner than the nubia Red Magic 3S, even though it was released just a bit more than a year before. The nubia Red Magic 3S has a bit faster CPU than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has 4 GB more RAM.
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s and nubia Red Magic 3S both have extremely similar displays, because although the nubia Red Magic 3S has a bit less pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a bit higher 1080 x 2340 resolution and a bit bigger display. The nubia Red Magic 3S captures way better photographs and videos than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because it has a much more mega-pixels back camera, a lot bigger camera sensor which offers a much better image and video quality, a larger aperture to capture better photos and videos in poorly lited situations and a much better video definition.
Nubia Red Magic 3S and Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s both count with similar storage to store more apps and games, both have the same 256 GB internal storage capacity. The nubia Red Magic 3S has a much better battery life than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s costs a little more money than the nubia Red Magic 3S, but you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.