Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 76.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2018-04-03 | 2020-09-02 |
| 5.94 x 2.95 x 0.32 inches | 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black and White | Sonic silver |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 639.00 | $ 579.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.36 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s is a little bit better than the nubia Red Magic 5S, getting a score of 83.8 against 76.2. Despite of the fact that the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s is much older than the nubia Red Magic 5S, it's body is thinner and lighter. Nubia Red Magic 5S has a bit sharper display than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because although it has a bit inferior quantity of pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a quite larger display and a slightly higher 1080 x 2340px resolution.
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s has a much greater memory to install applications and games than nubia Red Magic 5S, because it has 128 GB more internal storage. The nubia Red Magic 5S and Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s feature similar CPUs, both of them have 8 processing cores and 8 GB of RAM. Nubia Red Magic 5S takes much clearer pictures and videos than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, and although they both have the same diafragm aperture, the nubia Red Magic 5S also has a camera in the back with a lot higher resolution, a lot better video definition and a way bigger sensor.
Nubia Red Magic 5S has greater battery performance than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because it has a 32 percent larger battery size.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s costs a little more money than the nubia Red Magic 5S, but it's still a good choice, because you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.