Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Oppo |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2018-04-03 | 2020-05-21 |
| 5.94 x 2.95 x 0.32 inches | 6.28 x 2.85 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Black and White | Moonlight Black and Starry Blue |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 639.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.36 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s is slightly better than the OPPO Find X2 Neo, getting an 83.8 score against 77.7. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s is a way older, a bit thicker and a little heavier phone than OPPO Find X2 Neo. Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s has a bit faster processing unit than OPPO Find X2 Neo, although it has 4 GB less RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
The OPPO Find X2 Neo has a little more vivid display than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because it has a slightly better 1080 x 2400 resolution, a just a bit greater pixels quantity per inch of screen and a little bit larger display. OPPO Find X2 Neo counts with as much memory to store more apps and games as Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, they have the same 256 GB internal storage.
OPPO Find X2 Neo takes much clearer videos and photos than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the OPPO Find X2 Neo also has a much bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing lot better quality pictures, a bigger aperture to take better low light captures and videos and a camera with lot more mega-pixels.
OPPO Find X2 Neo features superior battery duration than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because it has a 4025mAh battery size against 3400mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.