Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2018-04-03 | 2023-12-11 |
| 5.94 x 2.95 x 0.32 inches | 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Black and White | Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 639.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G68 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.36 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, with a global score of 83.8 against 79.9. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s is an a lot older cellphone than the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, but it is a little bit thinner and a bit lighter anyway. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s counts with a much more powerful processor than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G features a bit more vivid display than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because although it has a bit less pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a little larger screen. The Galaxy A25 5G shoots much better videos and photos than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because although it has a smaller back camera sensor, and they both have the same video definition, the same 30 fps video frame rate and a same size aperture, the Galaxy A25 5G also counts with a way better resolution camera in the back.
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G features a quite bigger memory for apps and games than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a SD extension slot that allows up to 1 TB. Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has a superior battery duration than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because it has a 47% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.