Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-04-03 | 2019-09-20 |
| 5.94 x 2.95 x 0.32 inches | 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Black and White | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 639.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 1560 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 268 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.36 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s is a bit better than the Galaxy A30s, with a global score of 83.8 against 79.8. Even being the best phone in our current comparison, we must highlight that it's also older, somewhat heavier and a little thicker. Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s features a better screen than Samsung Galaxy A30s, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per screen inch and a way better 1080 x 2160 resolution.
Galaxy A30s counts with a bit bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 512 GB. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A30s, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s also has a greater amount of RAM.
Samsung Galaxy A30s has better battery performance than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s takes a bit better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A30s, because although it has a camera with way less mega pixels and a tinier camera aperture which is not so good for taking photographs and video in low light situations, it also counts with a much higher (4K) video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.