Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| 2018-04-03 | 2019-03-15 |
| 5.94 x 2.95 x 0.32 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 639.00 | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.36 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s is a little bit better than Galaxy A50, with an 83.8 score against 83.8. Although it's the best in this comparison, it must be told that it's also an older, just a little bit thicker and somewhat heavier device. Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s and Samsung Galaxy A50 both have extremely similar screens, although the Samsung Galaxy A50 also has a quite better pixels amount in each display inch, a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a quite bigger display.
Galaxy A50 counts with just a bit bigger memory to install applications and games than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with an external memory slot that holds up to 512 GB. Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s has just a little better hardware performance than Galaxy A50, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s also has more RAM.
The Galaxy A50 has improved battery duration than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3400mAh. Samsung Galaxy A50 counts with a slightly better camera than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because although it has a smaller sensor capturing worse quality pictures, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same 1920x1080 video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A50 also counts with a bigger aperture and a lot better resolution back camera.
Although Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Galaxy A50, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Galaxy A50. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, otherwise you can save some dollars and get the Galaxy A50, giving up some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.