Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| 2018-04-03 | 2021-03-17 |
| 5.94 x 2.95 x 0.32 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black and White | -- |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 639.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.36 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 is slightly better than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, with a global score of 90.7 against 83.8. Galaxy A52 is a just a little thicker cellphone than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, but they have equal weights. Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s has a bit faster CPU than Galaxy A52, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s and Galaxy A52 count with incredibly similar screens, although the Galaxy A52 also has a just a little greater display pixel density, a quite larger display and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels. The Galaxy A52 has more storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 1 TB.
The Galaxy A52 counts with improved battery duration than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because it has a 4500mAh battery size against 3400mAh. The Samsung Galaxy A52 has a very superior camera than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the same video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also has a lot larger sensor providing a way better image quality and a back facing camera with way more mega pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.