Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-04-03 | 2019-04-26 |
| 5.94 x 2.95 x 0.32 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 639.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.36 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s is a bit better than the Galaxy A70, having a global score of 83.8 against 76.9. Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s's body is older, just a little thicker and a little bit heavier than Galaxy A70. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s counts with a bit more powerful processor than Galaxy A70, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s also has a higher amount of RAM.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s counts with a little bit better looking display than Galaxy A70, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2160px and a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit higher pixels count per inch of screen. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s captures way better photographs and videos than Galaxy A70, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for low light photos and video, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s also counts with a bigger sensor.
The Samsung Galaxy A70 features just a bit more memory capacity for applications and games than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 512 GB. Galaxy A70 has greater battery life than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because it has a 32 percent larger battery capacity.
Although Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s is a better device, it costs a lot more than Galaxy A70, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Galaxy A70. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and buy the Galaxy A70, giving up some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.