Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2018-04-03 | 2021-02-22 |
| 5.94 x 2.95 x 0.32 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Black and White | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 639.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 402 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.36 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy F62 is a bit better than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, having an 88.1 score against 83.8. The Galaxy F62 body is a lot newer than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s's, but it is heavier and thicker. Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s features a bit more powerful processor than Galaxy F62, because it has more RAM memory and a higher number of cores.
Galaxy F62 counts with a bit more vivid screen than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because although it has a bit inferior number of pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a little bigger display. The Samsung Galaxy F62 counts with a greater camera than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the same aperture and the same video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy F62 also has a back-facing camera with a lot better resolution and a much larger sensor.
Galaxy F62 counts with a greater memory to install applications and games than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with an external memory card slot that allows up to 1 TB. Galaxy F62 features a superior battery lifetime than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because it has a 106% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.