Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2018-04-03 | 2020-03-06 |
| 5.94 x 2.95 x 0.32 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Black and White | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 639.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.36 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is better than the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, with a 98 score against 83.8. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G body is newer than the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s's, although it's somewhat heavier and just a bit thicker. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a bit better looking screen than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because it has more pixels per display inch, a better resolution of 1440 x 3200 and a larger display. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G captures much clearer photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, and although they both have the same aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a much higher 7680x4320 video definition, a back-facing camera with lot more MP and a lot bigger sensor providing a much better image quality.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features more storage capacity to install applications and games than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a very superior battery lifetime than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a lot more expensive than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, but you can get a better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.