Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12 |
| 2018-04-03 | 2022-02-25 |
| 5.94 x 2.95 x 0.32 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Black and White | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 639.00 | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.36 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S22 Ultra has a general score of 95.4, which is better than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s's 83.8 score. Even though the Galaxy S22 Ultra is notably newer than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, it's a little bit thicker and heavier. Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a way better display than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because it has a quite larger screen, a just a little more pixels per display inch and a better 1440 x 3088 resolution.
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s has a little bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra. Both of them have a 8 GB RAM memory and the same number of cores. Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s has a much bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra, because it has 256 GB internal storage.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra takes much clearer pictures and videos than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, and although they both have a same size camera aperture, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a lot larger back camera sensor providing a way higher image quality, a back camera with a way better resolution and a way better 7680x4320 video quality.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra features a really longer battery performance than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because it has a 47% bigger battery size.
Galaxy S22 Ultra costs a lot more money than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, but you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.