Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2018-04-03 | -- |
| 5.94 x 2.95 x 0.32 inches | -- |
| 6.67 ounces | -- |
| Black and White | -- |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 639.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.36 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s is a bit better than Galaxy S25, having an 83.8 score against 82.6. The Galaxy S25 counts with a much better display than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because it has a little larger display, a slightly higher 1080 x 2340px resolution and a little bit better pixels density. Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s counts with a way better performance than Samsung Galaxy S25. Both have the same RAM memory amount and a Octa-Core processing unit.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s counts with a much greater storage capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy S25, because it has 256 GB internal storage. Galaxy S25 shoots a lot better videos and photos than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, and although they both have a same size aperture, the Galaxy S25 also has a much higher video definition, a much larger back camera sensor providing a way higher image quality and a back facing camera with a much higher 50 MP resolution.
The Galaxy S25 counts with better battery life than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because it has an 18% larger battery size.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s is also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.