Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2018-04-03 | -- |
| 5.94 x 2.95 x 0.32 inches | -- |
| 6.67 ounces | -- |
| Black and White | -- |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 639.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 14.74 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.36 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S25 Ultra is slightly better than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, having a 90.7 score against 83.8. The Galaxy S25 Ultra is a way thinner and incredibly lighter cellphone than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s. The Galaxy S25 Ultra has a way better looking display than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because it has a better 1440 x 3088 resolution, a quite bigger display and a little bit higher pixel quantity in each screen inch.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s counts with a much more powerful processing unit than Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. Galaxy S25 Ultra has as much storage capacity for games and applications as the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s one, both of them have the same internal memory capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a very superior battery life than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because it has a 47% larger battery size. Galaxy S25 Ultra shoots greater photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because it has a much better video definition, a larger aperture for better images and videos in low-light environments, a lot bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a back facing camera with a lot higher 200 megapixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.