Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 80.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| -- | Android 5.0 |
| 2018-04-03 | -- |
| 5.94 x 2.95 x 0.32 inches | 5.78 x 2.90 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | -- |
| Black and White | -- |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 639.00 | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2100 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-T760 MP8 (650 MHz) GPU |
| 9.63 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 8.47 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.36 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy S6 Active, getting an 83.8 score against 80.9. The Samsung Galaxy S6 Active features a little bit better processing power than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because although it has 5 GB lesser RAM memory, and they both have 8 cpu cores, the Samsung Galaxy S6 Active also counts with an additional graphics co-processor and a 64-bit processing unit.
The Samsung Galaxy S6 Active has a lot better looking display than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a higher 2560 x 1440 resolution and a greater count of pixels per inch of display. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s has much more storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy S6 Active, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity.
Galaxy S6 Active has a little longer battery duration than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because it has a 3500mAh battery capacity against 3400mAh. Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s captures much better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy S6 Active, because although it has a much lower resolution back facing camera and a lower video resolution, it also counts with a bigger aperture and a bigger sensor which gives a higher photo and video quality.
Although Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Galaxy S6 Active, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Galaxy S6 Active. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and get the Galaxy S6 Active, letting go some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.