Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| 2018-04-03 | 2016-06-10 |
| 5.94 x 2.95 x 0.32 inches | 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Black and White | Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 639.00 | $ 247.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.36 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s is much better than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, getting a general score of 83.8 against 75.8. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s construction is newer and somewhat thinner than the Samsung Galaxy S7 Active's, although it is just a little bit heavier. The Galaxy S7 Active counts with a brighter screen than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a better count of pixels per inch in the display.
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s features a little better processing power than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a greater amount of RAM and 4 more cores. Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s features much more storage for applications and games than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s takes clearer photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, although it has a tinier camera aperture which is worse for taking pictures in low light situations, they both have a back-facing camera with a 12 MP, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same video frame rate.
The Galaxy S7 Active counts with better battery life than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3400mAh.
Although Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Samsung Galaxy S7 Active. If you want to save a few dollars, you can buy Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, giving up a few specs and features, but you'll get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.