Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| -- | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2018-04-03 | 2020-04-04 |
| 5.94 x 2.95 x 0.32 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Black and White | Black |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 639.00 | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | -- |
| 402 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.36 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s has a score of 83.8, which is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro's general score of 80.1. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s is an extremely older device than the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, but Xiaomi made it way lighter and extremely thinner. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s has just a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s also has more RAM memory.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a slightly better looking display than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and a greater pixel density. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s features a much better camera than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a tinier camera aperture, and they both have a same size back-facing camera sensor and a 12 mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera, the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s also counts with a much better (4K) video resolution.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s has a better memory to store more apps and games than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro features improved battery performance than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because it has a 4500mAh battery size instead of 3400mAh.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s not only is the best phones in our current comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to the other ones, making it very easy to pick between these phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.