Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-04-03 | 2020-01-31 |
| 5.94 x 2.95 x 0.32 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black and White | Black |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 639.00 | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 402 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.36 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s has an overall score of 83.8, which is a little bit better than the Galaxy XCover Pro's general score of 81. Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s's design is lighter and somewhat thinner than the Galaxy XCover Pro, even though it was released just 22 months before. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s features a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s also has 4 GB more RAM.
Galaxy XCover Pro has a display that's just as good as the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s one, although the Galaxy XCover Pro also has a bit larger screen, a bit greater count of pixels in each screen inch and a slightly higher 1080 x 2340 resolution. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s counts with a better storage for applications and games than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with more internal storage.
The Galaxy XCover Pro features greater battery lifetime than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because it has a 19 percent more battery capacity. Galaxy XCover Pro's camera is very similar to the camera in Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because although the Galaxy XCover Pro has a lot smaller back-facing camera sensor which gives a way lower photo and video quality, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same (Full HD) video resolution, it also counts with a larger aperture to capture better low-light images and video and a way higher resolution camera in the back.
Although Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, otherwise you can save some dollars and buy the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, letting go some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.