Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-04-03 | 2020-09-18 |
| 5.94 x 2.95 x 0.32 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Black and White | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 639.00 | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.36 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a general score of 94.6, which is much better than the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s's 83.8 general score. Galaxy Z Fold 2's construction is notably newer and thinner, but also a lot heavier than the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s. Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a bit better processing unit than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 and Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s both count with incredibly similar screens, because although the Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a little worse screen pixel density, it also counts with a better resolution of 1768 x 2208px and a bigger screen. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 takes just a bit better pictures and videos than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, and although they both have a same resolution back camera, the same (4K) video definition and the same aperture, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has higher 60 fps video frame rates and a way larger back-facing camera sensor which gives a way better image and video quality.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 and Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s count with very similar memory capacity for games and applications, they have equal internal memory capacity. Galaxy Z Fold 2 has better battery life than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 3400mAh.
Although Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a better device, it is way more expensive than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s. So if you need that extra features, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, else you can save a couple dollars and get the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, resigning some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.