Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 79 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Sony |
| -- | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2018-04-03 | 2018-04-05 |
| 5.94 x 2.95 x 0.32 inches | 5.31 x 2.56 x 0.48 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black and White | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 639.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 402 pixels per inch | 483 pixels per inch |
| -- | 700 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2870mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.36 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s is a little bit better than Xperia XZ2 Compact, getting an 83.8 score against 79. Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s's construction is notably thinner but somewhat heavier than the Xperia XZ2 Compact, and they were released with only 0 months difference. The Xperia XZ2 Compact features a sharper screen than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because although it has a quite smaller screen, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2160, the Xperia XZ2 Compact also counts with a little higher pixel count in each inch in the display.
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s has a bigger storage for games and applications than Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s features a bit more powerful CPU than Xperia XZ2 Compact, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The Xperia XZ2 Compact features just a bit better camera than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not recommended for low light images, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Xperia XZ2 Compact also counts with a camera in the back with much more mega pixels, better 60 frames per second video frame rate and a bigger sensor providing a higher image quality.
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s counts with a bit longer battery lifetime than Xperia XZ2 Compact, because it has an 18 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.