Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 77.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Sony |
| 2018-04-03 | 2017-04-05 |
| 5.94 x 2.95 x 0.32 inches | 5.75 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 5.68 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Blue and Silver |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 639.00 | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 402 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (960 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2900mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.36 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s is slightly better than the Xperia XZs, with an 83.8 score against 77.2. Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s's construction has the same thickness than the Xperia XZs, but it is heavier. Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s counts with a bit better hardware performance than Xperia XZs, because it has 4 GB more RAM memory and more cpu cores.
Xperia XZs counts with a display that's just as good as Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s's screen, because although the Xperia XZs has a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 1920px and a little smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little more pixels per inch in the display. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s has a superior storage capacity to store more games and applications than Sony Xperia XZs, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with more internal storage.
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s has just a bit better battery lifetime than Xperia XZs, because it has 3400mAh of battery capacity against 2900mAh. The Sony Xperia XZs counts with a very superior camera than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for taking photos and/or video in low-light situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Sony Xperia XZs also counts with faster video frame rate, a camera in the back with way more mega pixels and a larger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s is also a bit cheaper, making it easy to pick between these phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.