Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 78.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2018-04-03 | 2020-11-27 |
| 5.94 x 2.95 x 0.32 inches | 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Black and White | Cool blue, Power black and Yellow |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 639.00 | $ 149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 402 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.36 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s has a score of 83.8, which is slightly better than Xiaomi Poco M3's global score of 78.2. Despite of the fact that Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s is noticeably older than Xiaomi Poco M3, it's body is thinner and just a little bit lighter. Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s counts with a little faster processor than Xiaomi Poco M3, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s also has more RAM memory.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s has a bit better looking screen than Xiaomi Poco M3, because although it has a little smaller screen and a bit lower 1080 x 2160 resolution, it also counts with a just a little higher display pixels density. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s counts with more memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Poco M3, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory.
Xiaomi Poco M3 features a very superior battery performance than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3400mAh. The Xiaomi Poco M3 counts with a much better camera than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, and although they both have a same size camera aperture, the same video frame rate and the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video definition, the Xiaomi Poco M3 also has a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a much better image quality and a much higher resolution camera in the back.
Although Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Xiaomi Poco M3, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Xiaomi Poco M3. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can get Xiaomi Poco M3, giving up a couple features, but you'll get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.