Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Apple |
| 2018-11-01 | 2017-11-03 |
| 6.22 x 2.94 x 0.33 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Green | Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.63 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 24.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone X has a general score of 88.1, which is a bit better than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3's 83.8 score. Apple iPhone X's body is a bit thinner and much lighter than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, despite of the fact that it was released around 12 months before. The iPhone X has a little better hardware performance than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, because although it has lesser RAM memory and lesser and slower cpu cores, it also counts with a 64-bits processor.
The iPhone X has a bit better screen than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit higher resolution of 1125 x 2436 pixels, a quite brighter display and a just a little higher display density. IPhone X counts with as much memory for applications and games as the Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, they have the same 256 GB internal memory.
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 features greater battery duration than iPhone X, because it has 3200mAh of battery capacity instead of 2716mAh. Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 captures just a bit better photographs and videos than iPhone X, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition, the same 60 fps video frame rate and a same size aperture, the Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 also has a more mega pixels camera in the back and a larger sensor shooting better quality photos and videos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.