Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| 2018-11-01 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.22 x 2.94 x 0.33 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 6.17 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Green | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 152.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 24.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3520mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 is a little bit better than the Google Pixel 2 XL, with an 83.8 score against 82.5. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 construction is newer, but a bit thicker and heavier than Google Pixel 2 XL. Google Pixel 2 XL features a slightly better screen than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2880 resolution and a better pixels quantity per inch in the screen.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 has a little better processing power than Google Pixel 2 XL, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 also has 4 GB more RAM memory. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 has a slightly better camera than Google Pixel 2 XL, and although they both have the same video quality, a same resolution back camera and the same diafragm aperture, the Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 also has a bigger back-facing camera sensor and faster video frame rates.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 counts with a much bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 2 XL, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity. Google Pixel 2 XL counts with just a bit better battery duration than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, because it has 3520mAh of battery capacity instead of 3200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.